News

Building a Better BMI

ISB researchers have constructed biological body mass index (BMI) measures that offer a more accurate representation of metabolic health and are more varied, informative and actionable than the traditional, long-used BMI equation. The work was published in the journal Nature Medicine

For decades, clinicians have relied on BMI as a crude tool to classify individuals as underweight, normal weight, overweight or obese. BMI scores are calculated by dividing a person’s weight in kilograms by height in meters squared. About 30 percent of the population is misclassified by this approach. Despite its limitations, BMI continues to be insightful and widely accepted in the clinic, as it is a major risk factor for a number of chronic diseases, including diabetes, cardiovascular diseases and cancer.

“For years, BMI has been the go-to measure for doctors to classify individuals based on their height and weight in comparison to an average person. However, this average person doesn’t truly exist. We now have the capability to use advanced molecular measurements as a more comprehensive representation of a person’s metabolic health, which can be used to make more accurate clinical recommendations for individuals,” said Noa Rappaport, PhD, ISB senior research scientist and corresponding author of the paper. 

This illustration depicts a view we are all familiar with – looking down at one’s feet on a scale. However, the indicator of the body weight is replaced with a molecular layer indicating metabolic health status. The molecular layer, in this instance, is shifting to a worse value compared to the classical BMI – a reading that would otherwise be invisible without leveraging the underlying molecular data. (Art by Allison Kudla / ISB)

Rappaport and colleagues studied 1,000 individuals who enrolled in a wellness program by performing multi-omic profiling, examining more than 1,100 blood analytes such as proteins and metabolites, as well as genetic risk scores and gut microbiome composition collected at various time points. The researchers then generated machine learning models that led to more accurate predictive variations of a biological BMI than traditional measures of BMI alone. 

The team made several important findings, including: 

  • Those with a high biological BMI and normal traditional BMI were less healthy, but able to lose weight easier following a lifestyle intervention.
  • Those classified as obese with traditional BMI but with a normal biological BMI were more biologically healthy, and found it harder to lose weight.
  • When people made positive lifestyle changes, biological BMI was more responsive and dropped earlier than traditional BMI.

With positive lifestyle changes, the findings suggest that even if someone is not losing weight, they may be getting healthier biologically. 

“This work is a valuable asset for comprehending the molecular changes associated with obesity and metabolic health, and it has the potential to significantly improve the development of predictive and preventive clinical approaches for treating metabolic disturbances,” said Kengo Watanabe, PhD, lead author of the study and K. Carole Ellison Fellow in Bioinformatics.

Added Rappaport: “We have demonstrated the value of multi-omic profiling to reveal important insights into the complex relationships between obesity, metabolic health and chronic disease, and emphasized the need to consider a range of factors beyond traditional measures of BMI in understanding and addressing these issues.”

Recent Articles

  • Jacob Cavon Joins the Lab

    Jacob Cavon, PhD student in the Molecular Engineering and Sciences program at the University of Washington, recently jointed the lab. Jacob graduated from Montana State University, Bozeman with a BS in Cell Biology and Neuroscience. During his undergraduate career and post-graduation he characterized the function of an S. pyogenes virulence factor protein and contributed to a strep throat infection mouse model in Dr. Ben Lei’s lab. Before starting graduate school,…

  • ISB Building at dusk

    2023 Year in Review

    Throughout 2023, ISB research has been published in impactful peer-reviewed journals and our scientists have been featured in major media outlets and popular podcasts. In this 2023 Year in Review, we showcase some of our most important and interesting highlights of the year.

  • ‘1 in 1,000:’ Dr. Sean Gibbons Named Highly Cited Researcher for 2023

    ISB Associate Professor Dr. Sean Gibbons was named a Highly Cited Researcher for 2023. It is the second consecutive year Gibbons has earned the distinction. The Highly Cited Research list is generated annually by Clarivate, which says: “Of the world’s population of scientists and social scientists, Highly Cited Researchers are 1 in 1,000.”